Skilled immigrants moving in to developed countries are becoming increasing popular. However, some people believe that, skilled labors are migrating to fill vacancies and its part of usual movement while, others believe that, such immigration is a channel for rich countries to steal skilled labors from poor countries. In my opinion, I certainly agree with both their views and this essay will discuss on both categories and provide possible evidences behind it.
On the one hand, the skilled workers are invited across developed countries like Canada, Australia and so on. There are essentially two major reasons. Firstly, Earning potential high income in rich countries rather than being paid less in home countries is a vital factor. Based on their skilled ,they are provided with higher salary plus other benefits. Second important factor is that, their standardisation of living in developed countries have increased significantly competitive to their native country. The recent survey from Australian Immigration System reports that all around 2 lakh immigrants recently migrated to their country in last 3 years.
On the other hand, immigration seemed to be an excellent system for rich countries to examine talents outside of their country . However, there are two main exploitation happening as a result of this. Firstly, the skilled workers are becoming gradually reduced in their native countries. Secondly, this will also have a potential impact in their economic growth of their home countries. Recent survey from software association group called NASCOM predicts that by 2025 there will be huge demand or shortage of resource in the fields of Artificial Intelligence, Data science skilled labours.
In conclusion, I would reaffirm that, both the above factors equally contributes to its cause and effect. Although, the immigrants gets benefited for their specialisation in rich countries but, the fact is that their native country still lose their talents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s a vital factor. Based on their skilled ,they are provided with higher salary plu...
^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...examine talents outside of their country . However, there are two main exploitatio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51315789474 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75898084 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595394736842 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9198142082 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193703056087 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059826837051 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757042571211 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128832913283 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634808346432 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.