More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine.
Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world.
Do you agree or disagree?
In the contemporary society, people are always on the lookout for better opportunities and shift from one place to another when they find one. Although this may appear as robbing the developing nations of their most talented resources, some people think this is the general nature of humans. I support the latter and in the following paragraphs I will put forth the reasons.
To begin with, there are a number of reasons why people move from one country to another. Working in a developed country allows to achieve better standard of living due to generous pay packages whereas in third world countries resources are often exploited with a poor amount, barely sufficient to make the ends meet. Furthermore, workers are well appreciated with bonuses and holidays for their contributions which motivates them further to provide their best. They are also able to maintain work-life balance. For example, in a report published by a renowned job site, it has been estimated that workers receive better treatment and thrice as much salary in rich countries compared to when working in poor countries.
Moreover, the basic facilities provided are also a source of attraction. Basic amenities like good quality of food, free medical facilities for elders, upgraded health care system, modern education institutions and so forth are some of the attractions that further accounts for a healthy and glorious future which can solely be availed in developed countries. If these advantages were to be made available in the third world countries then resources would continue to reside in their own nations rather than migrating to foreign lands.
To recapitulate, there are far more advantages offered in rich countries along with appreciation for their hard work which attracts qualified resources and I believe that people should move to places where they are values for all the efforts they give.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'achieving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: achieving
.... Working in a developed country allows to achieve better standard of living due to genero...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...education institutions and so forth are some of the attractions that further accounts for a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lely be availed in developed countries. If these advantages were to be made availa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, third, well, whereas, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69047510213 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619672131148 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.4090905128 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.166666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213523215292 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697581038443 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724722932324 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126454777261 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597087084348 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.