More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine.
Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world.
Do you agree or disagree?
There is a contentious argument that supporting the relocation of professional from under developed countries to developed countries is percieved as theft while few views this as a normal migration of professionals. I totally disagree with this as one of the primary aim of been a professional is to practice in an enabling environment and make substantial renumeration too.
The main reason i completely disagree with this is because these professional while still undergraduates, dreamt of working in environment that can foster professional growth and development, while still getting meaningful job satisfaction. Looking at the structures in most under developed countries, it begs for questioning the vision and direction professional practices are heading. The continuous uncertainities and government failures have made increasing numbers of professionals look abroad to advance countries, to fill job opportunities. This provides more surety in fulfilling their dreams and aspirations.
In addition to this, renumeration for most professional practitionals are way below international standard. This raises a lot of concerns as professional in under developed countries feel undone by salaries being paid. In most caes, after expenditure on housing and feeding, there is little or nothing left to enrol for courses geared at professional development. This in the long run inpedes their professional growth.
In conclusion, migration of professional for opportunities in advanced countries is in no way stealing, this i completely disagree with. The surge is basically due to poor working environment and low renumerations. Given this situation authorities in poor countries should develop and implement a working structure, which would address these glaring concerns. This in the long run will help the professional see a longterm future in practicing and also dismiss the burning urge to relocate abroad.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, so, still, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77112676056 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45806021066 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584507042254 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5490377591 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.071428571 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0678995682091 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0284823443879 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334968427568 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0486351139985 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270619076167 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.