More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine.
Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world.
Do you agree or disagree?
Movement of talented individuals from poor countries to rich countries has always been a debatable topic, as many believe such migration causes poor countries to remain poor, as they loose talented individuals to rich counties, who benefit as a result of higher productivety of such individuals. The subsequent paragraphs of will analyse various aspects of this phenomenon, although I strongly disagree with these views.
Migration has always been one of the inherent charactristics of human being, as they have serached for beter opprtunities in the form of access to food or opportunities of survival. Similar motives still drive human being and in current world a better career opportunities is one of the primary drivers for migration. People from poorer countries choose to move to other countries to have better carreer opportunities which is otherwise not available in their home countries. The second important reason for such movement is concerns relating to physical safety and freedom of expression in their existing counties. Poor countries, struggling economically can be potential unsafe and have usually have more corruption in government institutions which affect the day to day life of citizens, causing then to look for safer countries.
Contrary to the above reasoning, no one can undermine the impact of loss of ingenious persons on poorer counties. Presence of such individuals in any country certainly benefits on the long run, as they bring innovation and better ideas to develope country's economy or to creat new business ideas. In addition, they also tend to set better examples for coming generation, where individuals can choose to remain in their own country and create better opportunities than moving to foreign counties. Such an trend will create a positive economic cycle which can certainly help poorer countries to devlope faster.
To summarise, deciding to migrate is a choice every individual makes and such choice is driven by one's fundamental desire of proving better opportunities for himself and for his loved ones. Any such choice has to be respected and better not seen through the lenses of rich or poor counties.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 698, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...an be potential unsafe and have usually have more corruption in government instituti...
^^^^
Line 5, column 502, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...s than moving to foreign counties. Such an trend will create a positive economic c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, second, so, still, then, as to, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90974313458 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.7157684856 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.307692308 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3076923077 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216605144832 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714609441143 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865288621933 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133126751341 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725469243506 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.