Many museums charge an admission fee while others are free. Do you think that the advantages of charging admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Museums are known as integral educational and excursion places around the world since time immemorial. Many of them charge entrance ticket fees while some are free these days. I strongly advocate that charging some amount to visitors at museums broadly outweighs the shortcomings of this implication.
First and foremost, a small amount of fee submission can help the museums to maintain well for visitors. Tourists will experience better and will recommend their family and friend to visit museums. As a result, the number of visitors will increase. Secondly, museums can arrange some special programs and exhibitions with the availability of adequate funds. They can invite some famous artists and scientists to conduct events of public interest such as painting, astronomy, and archaeology to give lectures on their findings. On a further note, Museums need enough funds to buy new showpieces which are certainly expensive because of their rare existence. They can afford such art and crafts with the regular collection of money in the form of admission fees.
Conversely, it discourages people to visit museums as they can access many other fun places with the same money. Most people especially kids feel bored at such places and show their interest in Theme parks and restaurants instead of visiting museums if they are charging an entrance fee. Moreover, because of few visits to museums, many children are unfamiliar with immense knowledge of art, science, history, and culture which they can learn at museums.
The conclusion to be drawn is that entry fee helps the museums to provide better experiences to visitors with new arrivals at the museum and events; however, many people are reluctant to visit museums due to admission fee which makes them stay away from essential knowledge.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27083333333 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63508497766 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597222222222 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1359442508 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.428571429 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272077648951 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894246963438 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753517929652 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180668056139 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663202718005 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.