Some people feel that the cost of space exploration is far too high for the benefits it brings while others argue that we space programs should continue no matter what the cost. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The dynamics of the universe discoveries have changed dramatically with the advent of groundbreaking satellites, supercomputers, and rocket technologies. Certain demographics hold the statement that it would not add value to mankind enough to spend billions of dollars on space projects; however, others believe such initiatives are necessary for the betterment of life on earth. As for as I see, it is essential to keep eye on any foreseeable events which could threaten the existence of our planet.
First and foremost, approaching the outer world requires a lot in terms of money, effort, and technology. That is an emerging field and scientists are experimenting on the new findings which demand millions of dollars for research and developments. Sometimes it is a huge loss if the mission fails. That is why people think that we do not need immediate exploration of space at the cost of taxpayers’ money as this money can be used in some other social welfare work. NASA, for instance, has spent around 10 billion dollars on Mars mission for human colonization still they are struggling for a successful mission.
Conversely, security and defense of earth is an inevitable need of mankind. There are many extinctive events that have been occurred to our planet which changed life on earth like dinosaur extinction with comet strike. Therefore, it is better to carry on research on exploration to protect the earth from any possible danger heading towards our planet and take action accordingly. Hollywood movies like Deep Impact has shown the predictions of space scientist that how vulnerable is our earth from objects traveling in the space.
I am of the opinion that the world’s economy is based on trillions of dollars and it is in the best interest of people to allow governments to spend some money for the protection of our habitat as everything would be meaningless if we could not protect life on our planet.
The conclusion to be drawn is that admittedly space agencies have spent a plethora of money on failed space missions while it is also a paramount need of our planet to protect from any unforeseeable incidences which have been happened on earth in the past.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, conversely, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, as for, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05509641873 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9420430022 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542699724518 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.5657005378 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.071428571 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9285714286 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142428637787 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446920185972 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050647034749 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807370689908 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288962777955 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.