More houses are needed in many countries to cope with increasing populations. Would it be better to build houses in existing towns and cities, or to develop new towns in rural areas?
Nowadays, the number of residents of metropolitan cities is on the increase and consequently they need accommodation which is a basic need of life. People have different views on the issue of whether new houses should be built in existing cities or not. I would argue that develop new towns in rustic areas would be more beneficial for the people and governments.
On the one hand, the existing cities are almost crowded all over the globe and the residents of these mega cities suffer from air pollution which is caused by exhaust fumes and greenhouse gasses and traffic congestion that is a nuisance in individuals' life. Government authorities could not tackle the problem so expanding the existing cities is not a good solutions. Furthermore, for building new houses more natural habitats should be destroys and it would affect the wild life and we would encounter plant and animal extinction in the future and it would be a threat to the nature and unspoiled environment. A salient example of this is the USA that in 1998 lost more than 70% of its natural environment due to the deforestation.
On the other hand, by developing new towns in rural areas government can improve the economy of the country since this trend have positive impact on the local people by providing more job opportunities and bringing income for local people. Moreover, it would be a potent motivation for affluent people to invest money on these building projects. Besides, a majority of senior citizens of the mega cities will move to new developed cities due to accessing fresh air and water. TO support my claim, I can refer to an article having been published in Times magazine, indicates that Germany could take steps to tackle the air pollution by developing new cities and it could enhanced the situation in 2007.
In conclusion, although there are more recreational facilities and health and educational services in big cities, the elderly residents of the metropolitan cities would prefer to move to new developed cities in rural areas to access better water and air. This would be beneficial not only for the residents but also for the governments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'solution'?
Suggestion: solution
...nding the existing cities is not a good solutions. Furthermore, for building new houses m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'areas'' or 'area's'?
Suggestion: areas'; area's
... hand, by developing new towns in rural areas government can improve the economy of t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 671, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'enhance'
Suggestion: enhance
...n by developing new cities and it could enhanced the situation in 2007. In conclusion...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, as to, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97777777778 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76505977432 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.3021199036 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.846153846 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6923076923 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309398739329 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107272681765 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818573782008 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201486336582 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659022901804 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.