Most people prefer to eat outside food rather than homemade food now.
Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, most of the people would opt to eat a take-away, or at a restaurant rather cooking food at home. In my opinion, the outside food is a junk with a high number of calories, leading to obesity and diabetes.
To begin with, the only benefit of eating an outside food is that it saves our cooking time, which is nearly 3 hours per day in an average Indian family. Owing to the fact most of the families these days require both sexes to work to meet their financial needs, and many live in a nuclear family. Thus, parents are responsible not only to cook, but also to look after the needs of young ones, such as helping them with studies and extra-curricular activities. Therefore, in order to prioritize their work, and to wind-down after a hard day at work, many people prefer to order food from outside.
On the contrary, unfortunately, most people these days have grown up on convenience foods. They are unaware that most of the food cooked outside home kitchen consists of high quantity of salts, sugars, and saturated fats. Thus, leading to obesity, heart diseases, and diabetes. Apparently, in a recent survey conducted by WHO, most of the developed nations have the mounting number of obese people including children, and they require regular medical care. Consequently, resulting in an increasing pressure on hospitals and the government financial budget.
To conclude, I would like to say that although foods from restaurants and take-aways enables us to divert the cooking time to family time or fun time, the underlining negative impact of take-away and restaurant foods are causing serious adverse impact on our health, even leading to increase in fatality rates.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: Whom
...rently, in a recent survey conducted by WHO, most of the developed nations have the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, look, so, therefore, thus, such as, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95070422535 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69821257888 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588028169014 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1198731092 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.166666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203395474355 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728287329297 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587794940263 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131713096218 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574300909888 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.