With increasing populations and ever growing urban centres, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots. What are benefits of protecting places for natural beauty spots? How can it be solved?
There is no doubt that to accommodate the growing population and the construction of town-centres by humans have destroyed natural sites. I believe that time has now arrived that certain measures should be taken to protect them and to embrace benefits from it.
To begin with, there are numerous advantages of protecting natural sites. Firstly, it is learning about our natural environment. Children should be brought to these beautiful sites and taught about the importance of ecosystem and food chain in a human life-cycle. Also, why the natural habitat is vital for animals and plants to flourish? Secondly, it increases tourism, countries, such as New Zealand attracts lots of tourist because of its beautiful natural places, which has helped the country to improve its economy and has created jobs in the tourist industry, for example hotels industry and local shops.
Turning to the possible solutions, the government should impose laws to protect natural sites, local animal, and plant species, and whoever tries to violate the law, strict actions should be taken against them. Furthermore, the government along with the local charitable organization should generate money to maintain the scenery of these beautiful sites. In addition, the government should prohibit the construction of houses to provide housing for people. If the shopping centres and hotels have to be constructed for the feasibility of tourists, they should have a norm to follow. Consequently, disobeying the law should lead to the cancellation of their permit to do business.
To conclude, I would like to say that protecting our natural environment not only educates us about the importance of biodiversity in our ecosystem but also generates revenue through tourism. Thus, the people and government should work hard to maintain these beautiful sites.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in addition, no doubt, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40625 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81833029094 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586805555556 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7662866865 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.214285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227627403849 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802272473058 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359352107841 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140259315601 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542903139043 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.