Pollution of rivers, lakes and seas is a major concern for people who seek to protect the environment. What are the possible causes of water pollution, and what effects does this have on animal life and human society?
Water contamination is a serious form of pollution, and one that can be challenging to rectify.
There seem to be two main causes involved, and a variety of damaging effects on people and the
biosphere, which we will discuss here.
Probably the main factor is the issue of emissions from cars, factories and other human
activities. These emissions contain damaging pollutant particles which can contaminate rainwater
run-off and thus enter the water cycle, by transferring through the water table into aquifers, streams
and rivers. Filtration and processing are not really viable options for such large volumes of water,
and so the water table remains tainted with these elements over long periods, as we see in Eastern
Europe today. In situations where soil erosion and logging have already damaged the local
environment, the accumulation can be very serious. The other major cause is accidental or deliberate
dumping of waste products in places outside of controlled landfills or waste processing centres.
Even small amounts of abandoned waste can enter water supplies through the ground, often
undetected.
The effects on animal life can be severe, especially for species which are already endangered
by such threats as poaching, habitat loss and food chain disruption. Contaminated water can lead to
dwindling numbers or even potential extinction, as may indeed happen to the Asian tiger
populations. The impact on human society can also be distressing, including the poisoning of drinking
water, famine or drought due to lack of safe irrigation, and long-term loss of land as we see, for
example, after the Bhopal poisoning catastrophe in India. Such effects tend to have an especially
grave impact on the very poorest in society, with the least resources to counter the environmental
effects.
Overall, we see that emissions and dumping are the main origins of the problem, and that the
effects on both humans and animals are exacerbated by the existing environmental, criminal or social
problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-05 | NAVNEET BALI | 73 | view |
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society.To what extent do you agree with this view? 61
- Today people can work and live in anywhere they want because of the improvement of communication technology and transport Do advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages Opinion and discussion essay 84
- Pollution of rivers, lakes and seas is a major concern for people who seek to protect the environment. What are the possible causes of water pollution, and what effects does this have on animal life and human society? 73
- Should Government Provide Free Health Care? 73
- Successful companies use advertisement to make more sales What can make an advertisement very effective Do you think this is a bad thing or a good thing for the society 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...imal and humans is extremely dreadful. Some of the animal species are on the verge of exti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, thus, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44561403509 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85393681971 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582456140351 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2857809168 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204695548816 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786334788858 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549556109359 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138920280882 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285060264356 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.