News stories on TV and news papers are very often acompanied by pictures, some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this.
Images have become an integral part of the news on TV or in newspapers. Some people believe that adding the photographs relevant to the news will be more effective than the theoretical story. I completely agree with this phenomenon, in this fast-paced world; people only skim through the headlines and pictures which makes the news easier to comprehend. I will support my stance with valid arguments and examples.
Media is a highly competitive market and the journalist makes a lot of efforts to make their news interesting and attractive for the audience. It is quite evident that news with images grabs more attention. As through viewing pictures, the reader can quickly identify if the news is important to read further or not. To elucidate the point here, pictures make the news more appealing and attracting. For instance, I am a big fan of a political leader Imran Khan. If I see his picture in any newspaper, I make sure to read the whole story to stay updated about him. There is a probability of skipping the whole news if it's only mentioned in words.
Furthermore, through picture illustrations, media grabs the attention of all the age groups. For example, there is a separate session every Sunday magazine for kids. My daughter loves reading different stories and viewing beautiful cartoon pictures from the magazine and does not leave any page unread. That is primarily because of the appealing tactics of media that enforce the reader to read every part. If there is an incident reported at TV without the images, people will listen to the story with less interest. Whereas, if the same incident is shown with certain images, people will be eager to see more pictures to build an image in their mind.
To summarize, photography plays a pivotal role in any news success be it on Television or in the newspaper. Physiologically, people tend to view news with pictures as these images help them build their imaginations around the story more conveniently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctures to build an image in their mind. To summarize, photography plays a pivota...
^^^
Line 4, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons around the story more conveniently.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, whereas, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92492492492 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7562267641 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9636899377 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3157894737 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5263157895 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.89473684211 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295336269458 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868881716392 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663368256364 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187284054551 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570376477026 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.