News stories on TV and in newspaper are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this?
People have different views about the effectiveness of words as oppose to pictures. It is sometimes argued that the News that is accompanied by some pictures is more effective than those without any images. Although pictures can have a great impact on the audiences, I believe that words are more impressive.
There are a variety of reasons why some people discuss that pictures have a crucial impact on the News followers. Firstly, pictures seems appealing to people and they attract more individuals to follow a News by reading the newspaper or watching TV. Secondly, pictures are eye-catching and this is the main reason for the popularity of TV among people while other Medias such as radio are by far less popular. Finally, pictures help fellows to get the gist of the News just by looking at the picture even if they do not read the News or listen to the reporter. To support my claim I can refer to an article having been published in Times magazine, indicates that more that 40% of the residents of Europe just look at the pictures on newspapers and only 4% read the news.
On the other hand, there are some persuasive ideas in favor of the impact and strength of the words. Many people know words as the main source of communication and they assert that its impact cannot be superseded by a few colorful pictures. Furthermore, people can obtain more information through reading a full article than just looking at the images. Moreover, it is not only the picture that can grab the audiences’ attention, but also the headline of the News is the most effective part of it. A salient example of this is the Times newspaper that has the least number of the pictures in it but it is the most popular newspaper among the American.
In conclusion, it is true that many people find reading monotonous but I believe that looking at the pictures can provide us with a shallow information. The magic power of the words should not be neglected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: AS_OPPOSE_TO_AS_OPPOSED_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as opposed to'?
Suggestion: as opposed to
... views about the effectiveness of words as oppose to pictures. It is sometimes argued that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'News'.
Suggestion: News
...they attract more individuals to follow a News by reading the newspaper or watching TV...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72514619883 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65892227257 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488304093567 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0791722004 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.733333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310471601938 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109969351909 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630410653687 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18873345718 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856605286666 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.