Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety to other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The subject of using animals as patient zeroes has provoked many debates recently. While some people have a strong conviction that it is a wrong action in terms of morality and should be prohibited, others, however, believe that it is beneficial to us in order to find cures and put other medicines to the test to realize (study) their effectiveness. I, for one, think the latter is sometimes more sensible on the basis of some compelling reasons.
On the one hand, many say that testing on animals should be banned because it is morally wrong to make them feel pain. In Fact, having the rights of living, these animals are the creatures of God, as well as humans, and should be respected. Animals that undergo various painful experiments suffer from the pain, and in turn, is it morally unaccepted to destroy their lives in order to save ours. It might be due to their lack of capability to speak, otherwise, they would tell us how evil creatures we are that torture them.
On the other hand, many put forward the argument that these experiments bring benefits to us. Firstly, some animals like mice both outnumber humans, and scientifically speaking, are perfect for these tests in the light of their genes alike. In fact, these types of animals are not endangered, and can also be so useful to find cures for many diseases that we might contract at the same time. Therefore, under some special circumstances, I think we can capitalize on these mere animals so that we could save the lives of thousands of people. Secondly, despite the fact that animal tests might sound wrong, they may be the only alternative to develop cures for some illnesses to be cured. Thus, with trial and error (clinical trials) chances are we succeed in producing medical treatments way faster than the normal way (procedures).
In conclusion, I entirely understand why some people contend that these experiments are not moral and ethical, but there exist a number of occasions in which we have no other choice but doing so.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun put seems to be countable; consider using: 'many puts'.
Suggestion: many puts
... that torture them. On the other hand, many put forward the argument that these experim...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, i think, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78901734104 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55009779494 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560693641618 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3504710879 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.357142857 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3571428571 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360737212458 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118376991163 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685275820821 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213670076687 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247033894638 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.