Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people contend that universities ought to admit an equal number of students for each subject in terms of their sex. I, for one, believe that the given statement is not only incorrect but also impossible on the basis of some compelling reasons.
To begin with, accepting the exact equal number of male and female students would be morally and ethically wrong. If universities set an equal number for each group regarding their genders, it simply means that a few students would be rejected just because of this vacuous rule. Here, the main question is what if more number of girls, or boys, are competent enough for entry? As a result, universities should not force numerical equalization, and instead, give them the chance to compete in the normal way, irrespective of their sex.
Additionally, students’ tastes are varied. Opting for their desirable majors at educational centers, these students would inevitably be in both genders; and therefore, imposing restrictions on equality in entry admission can be nonsense. Furthermore, different majors would require distinctive qualities. It is self-explanatory that both mentioned groups are good at particular areas. The majors themselves also might not pique all students’ interests. That is, due to the fact that there might be special abilities in specific genders, all the topics would not be suitable for all students. So, it would be quite not feasible to fracture all the majors into equal two halves of male and female students.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that this argument will not work since it is not possible to separate students in exactly two numerically identical males and females.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22388059701 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84939797763 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600746268657 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0912516966 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212631882823 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747089247951 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071357035528 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128206705664 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699843319689 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.