Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do?
It is true that humans’ activities in different ways have been causing many destructions to the environment. However, there are some steps that both governments and individuals can take to tackle the problems.
The truth is we are irreparably damaging our environment in many ways. High rates of carbon dioxide emission into the atmosphere can be the most paramount one. Each day we emit tons of this harmful gas into the air through our cars and factories. Another detrimental attitude could be deforestation. Many people have been using up lands and cutting trees for personal purposes. The result of the aforementioned phenomena clearly contributes to global warming.
However, there exist some steps to be taken by governments to address these conundrums. First and foremost, imposing restrictions on personal car use, such as ‘green taxes’, would be a progressive action. Legislators can instead provide society with free and convenient public transport in which they are as comfortable as personal cars. Second, statesmen need to cease cities growth, and they rather need to educate people to have fewer children in order to control population growth as well. Constructing more high-rise buidings and accommodating people in them would be another wise solution to the deforestation issue.
Additionally, some provisions must be made by individual people themselves to alleviate the situation. Not driving their cars, and start using public transportation instead could be a good start. In fact, The more people have more eco-friendly attitudes, the better it is for the nature. People also should realize that by having fewer children, they can help the world to control population growth in which account for many contaminations on the planet.
In conclusion, although we have been damaging our nature in recent decades, we can still take some steps to address the problems. For doing so, every person and group, as well as statesmen, are responsible and the time to act is now, there is no room for complacency.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29102167183 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97780998691 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59133126935 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1029312857 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.9473684211 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84210526316 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211670374254 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589775067101 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547787591633 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12107792302 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383290430475 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.