Technology is getting advanced day by day with increase in demand. Computer and phones are used as a translator and the demand for humans have decreased. This essay will discuss why the use of human being is decreasing as a translator and interpreter.
It is true, technology advancement has reduced the requirement of a man in translation. Programming and software has made work easy for a machine like mobile phone and computer to interpret any language. For example, Japanese language was a toughest part of the trip as english language is also not familiar. Locating translator consumes time and money, using mobile phone as a translator was a best way. Additionally, Training and lot of learning is required for studying different language. In my opinion, using cell phones and systems is the best possible solution for language translation.
However, use of mobiles and laptop is not a possible way for language translation. Electronic items are software based and can be effected by virus. Last year, Banking software was attacked by virus resulting in copying of bank data. Secondly, gestures of the translator cannot be understood by computer translator. These drawbacks cannot be avoided.
In my opinion, computers and mobile phone are better option rather than human being for interpretation. Any body can take access of translator on phone at any time and at any place. No need of pre planning is required.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easing as a translator and interpreter. It is true, technology advancement has r...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...age. For example, Japanese language was a toughest part of the trip as english la...
^
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... using mobile phone as a translator was a best way. Additionally, Training and lo...
^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'Anybody'?
Suggestion: Anybody
...er than human being for interpretation. Any body can take access of translator on phone ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 232.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18965517241 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95623044674 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.4085323999 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.8235294118 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6470588235 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390995996609 0.244688304435 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121116767133 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101648481887 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224705893882 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0625996060452 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.