Nowadays a large amount of advertising aiming at children should be banned because of the negative effects. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is true that there are more and more advertising targeted on children nowadays. While some people argue that it should be banned, i do believe that these advertising have its own beneficials.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why advertising for kids should be banned. The first reason is that if they spent too much of their times on watching advertisements, the rest amount of time they have for others important activities, such as studying, would be shortened. Consequently, their learning results would be impacted detrimentally. Furthermore, it can lead to some health problems. If children keep their eyes glued to screens for several hours, waves from televisions, computers and wifi devices may cause headaches.
On the other hand, i disagree with the idea that approve banning policies of advertisements on children. One reason is that watching advertisements on TV allows children broden their own knowledge straightforwardly and easier to remember. For example, the lively colour video of tree growth from a seed to mature body is the clear illustrate why kids remember this lesson. The another reason is it can play an integral part in build strong relationship between family 's members. There are a lot of fun advertisements parents and their children can sit around together and watch, talk about the same interesting products advertised and find out their common points. Hence, the gap between generations would be narrowed.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, i believe that advertising aimed on children should not be banned.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... people argue that it should be banned, i do believe that these advertising have ...
^
Line 9, column 20, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ause headaches. On the other hand, i disagree with the idea that approve ban...
^
Line 13, column 49, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...usion, for the reasons mentioned above, i believe that advertising aimed on child...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25984251969 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02022652189 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614173228346 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7670898665 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4285714286 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197205290458 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725560027167 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615796513175 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144398466046 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403663769806 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.