Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs Therefore it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Over the last decades society has undergone remarkable changes in many fields, from technology to society. Particularly relevant has been the progress that has pushed forward the role of the women in our society. Confined in the past in the rather unpleasant position of mother and housewife, it is now commonplace for women to have jobs and in many cases to perform duties which had been traditionally covered by men. This important step forward has set a milestone in the history of mankind, so that women these days can enjoy the same opportunity and have the same rights of men. Less politically significant but not less important, is the fact that this revoultion has been taking place in our homes as well.
Given that more and more women have regular jobs and spend a lot of time in offices, hospitals, schools or on the line of duty, many believe that houshold tasks like should be equally shared and not be regared as a female work.

Mentality has dramatically changed over the years so that it would be nowadays out of date for a man to refuse to accomplish simple jobs like doing the washing up aor hoovering. Furthermore technology comes help in an unprecedented way. In the past most of those duties must have been accomplished manually which resulted not only in a huge waste of time but it was also hard work as well. These days, washing machines, dryers, hoovers and dishwasher are able to execute those tasks better and faster than people can do.

Summing up, given all that, I think that men should make their part to keep an apartment clean and to get done household tasks. Those duties should be not considered as something that only women should accomplish but in a family as well as in the society rights and duties should be equally reparted. After all, even for a man, it must not be so difficult to wash, clean and dry since machines can carry out automatically all these jobs.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'decades'' or 'decade's'?
Suggestion: decades'; decade's
Over the last decades society has undergone remarkable change...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iety. Confined in the past in the rather unpleasant position of mother and housew...
^^
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...ike doing the washing up aor hoovering. Furthermore technology comes help in an unprecedent...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unprecedented way" with adverb for "unprecedented"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ring. Furthermore technology comes help in an unprecedented way. In the past most of those duties must ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, well, after all, i think, as well as, in many cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69642857143 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54480819569 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556547619048 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.0976598439 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.384615385 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8461538462 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192034319276 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604934650514 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455137219452 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11428042414 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455832375824 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.