Nowadays, more people prefer to communicate via text message and email instead of face to face.
Why do you think this is? When is face to face to face communication necessary?
Over the last few decades, the advancement in technology has changed the way people communicate. These days, a lot of people choose to interact with each other by means of text message and emails rather than face to face. This essay will discuss the reasons associated with this trend. This essay will also discuss the need when face to face communication becomes inevitable.
One of the major reasons for people choosing emails or text message mode over meeting personally to communicate is convenience. People can communicate instantly with anyone from anywhere via emails and SMS. They no longer need to go anywhere or spend time just to convey their message or inform about any important events. In addition, communication through emails or text message save cost as well. People can interact with their colleagues or family members just by messaging apps such as Whatspp or emails which is very cheap as it only needs internet connection. For instance, whenever the employer needs to connect his employees he can simply send emails to discuss important topics or can send text messages instantly without wasting time and money to meet them personally. In other words, because of the enormous time and cost saving that it allows, people prefer to interact via SMS or email rather than meeting face to face.
However, there are various factors such as effectiveness and developing strong relationship where face to face communication is inevitable. Face to Face communication and in person meetings can boost efficiency instead of spending an entire day in sending mail back and forth, and can effectively communicate by his facial expression and body language. In addition, people need to spend more time in person to create genuine bond. Direct contact creates sense of understanding that makes people more conformable with one another and develop strong relations between them. For instance, a manager can build strong bond and communicate effectively with his sub-ordinates and only when he meets them personally to ensure that message or instructions are conveyed properly. In short, meeting in person develops effective communication and strong relationship.
To sum-up, although technology can ease individual life by offering cost and time saving, in certain cases where effectiveness and relationship matters human’s personal interaction becomes inexorable.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, for instance, in addition, in short, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39678284182 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87816061952 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528150134048 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2200902473 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.833333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7222222222 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378435341477 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134989729977 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125089507833 0.0667982634062 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226217128229 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140869752588 0.056905535591 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.