Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Why do you think it is happening? Is it a negative or positive development?
Robots are the most recent gift of modern technological advancement. Usage of these bots has increased tremendously in last few years. Surely a number of reasons are there to support the fact. However, there are both negative and positive impacts of this new generation tool. This essay focuses on some of the core causes of using robots also investigates its effect.
Robots are being enormously employed both at home and workplace not only for human convenience but also for perfection. In US, people use home assistant robots to take care of the security and power control. Furthermore, programmable robotic arms are also been seen to cook food with proper precision. But industries probably utilized robots in the best way possible and achieved the commercial success that they ever had. According to an article published in New york times, most companies with higher growth are seemed to using robotic support for their operations and logistics. So, as an efficient assistant robots are started to be trusted blindly. Hence, people are moving towards automation these days.
Though dependency on robots has some negative sides but it's contribution to make things better can not be overlooked completely. Manual operations has already been taken over by automation causing unemployment which at the same time improved efficiency and precision. Robotics has other applications in the area of education, medicine, and security. In addition to that, modern research has reached to an ineffable level as extreme experiments are being conducted successfully by agents of Artificial Intelligence(AI).
According to a space research institute, more than 70% tasks of NASA's launch program are conducted and monitored by robots, which clearly discloses their secret of multiple successful missions. Therefore, its hard to deny the role is played by these machines for our overall betterment.
To sum up, there are solid reasons to let the machines take over human responsibilities, which is also expected to get extended. Though some of us might consider that as an issue but its a demand of time now to keep pace with robust technological advancement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... generation tool. This essay focuses on some of the core causes of using robots also invest...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 583, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ort for their operations and logistics. So, as an efficient assistant robots are start...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 613, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'robot'?
Suggestion: robot
...ogistics. So, as an efficient assistant robots are started to be trusted blindly. Henc...
^^^^^^
Line 15, column 184, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... us might consider that as an issue but its a demand of time now to keep pace with ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3431085044 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93476163037 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604105571848 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6229982856 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.05 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0895307979609 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0242203634185 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338771559085 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0460853026174 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255935975486 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.