Nowadays people have free access to music and films online. Is this a positive or a negative development?
Provide relevant examples from you own experience.
The internet and technology have not left a single aspect of our life untouched, especially the way we access music and films, which are now available to watch and listen from anywhere. In my opinion, if we examine its impact on individual and on society as a whole, it is a mixed blessing, whose effectiveness lies only in the way users used it.
To begin with, cost free multimedia has changed the face of entertainment industry by its recent advancements. When TV used to be only source of relaxation, people not only has to spend a lot of money but also was bounded to sit in front of it. On the other hand, online content comes at very free of cost and excellent quality, and provide platform to for new artists to show their potential, which was extremely difficult in the past and has revolutionized the whole film industry. For example, YouTuber all over the world are getting popular as result of diverse online market. Thus, viewer and the artists both are benefitted by the free online films and music.
However, it is not as lucrative as it sounds because it has some serious implication on our daily lives. Due to free access, people started spending a lot of their time in watching movies, which has impacted their productivity and made them lethargic. For example, on an average, people spend at least 2 hours on their devices to watch music and movie videos. In addition, it is impossible to prevent piracy on the internet, which has become a nightmare for the producers who have invested their fortune in the production of those films. Thus, the popularity on online movies is dangerous for individual as well as society.
In conclusion, online free multimedia market has both upside and downside but it is up to people to what extent they should exploit it. It is time to come up with better strategy to regulate its legal and illegal usage for the betterment of the community.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, well, as to, at least, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72072072072 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65305755499 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564564564565 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1412227286 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.285714286 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127898999111 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436818025172 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426422327303 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726922422524 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216043853607 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.