Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development?

Submitted by mahyarr on Sat, 10/30/2021 - 16:30

Due to the massive changes that technology has undergone, people now communicate with one another differently. There exist specific means that technology has impacted the way that people make relationships. I, for one, believe that it is rather a positive development on the basis of some compelling reasons.
To begin with, technological advancement has drastically altered the way people contact each other. Firstly, daily conversations between family members and friends that used to be face-to-face, have been replaced by online applications (communication/confabulation). Take WhatsApp or Instagram as an example; they are used by the majority of the public in terms of communication. Second, another huge change that has been made concerns finding a partner online. In fact, with the existence of online dating websites and applications, many find it quite straightforward to look for a suitable soulmate soul mate (their significant other) among a multitude of alternatives.
Admittedly, this development is beneficial as a whole. First and foremost, many job prospects have been created in the past couple of years that have never been considered as a job and source of income. Being capitalized on to influence or introduce the services and products, these online platforms have been the linchpin of every business organization. YouTube and Facebook are salient illustrations that are used to reach out to more clients or impact more people in terms of their would-be problems in various fields. People also are able to contact their beloved family members or other acquaintances more readily. They do not have to wait a prolonged period of time to travel long distances to meet; they instead easily contact each other by video calls.
In conclusion, technological improvements have massively changed (has certainly revolutionized) the way people interact with each other. I think the benefits accruing from this positive development are by no means negligible, especially when it comes to business interactions and day-to-day conversations.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task II - IELTS General Training

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'applications'' or 'application's'?
Suggestion: applications'; application's
...e-to-face, have been replaced by online applications communication/confabulation. Take Whats...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 532, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun find seems to be countable; consider using: 'many finds'.
Suggestion: many finds
...nline dating websites and applications, many find it quite straightforward to look for a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...y. They do not have to wait a prolonged period of time to travel long distances to meet; they ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, second, so, i think, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52866242038 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39280656012 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601910828025 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3289626131 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353733199445 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114453148783 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113047933755 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230232845894 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079202740354 0.056905535591 139% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.