Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
It has often been argued that distinct behavior has been noticed with the advancement of technology in lives. Technology has forced people to follow the practical path rather, thinking from heart and has forced people to see benefits in relationship. In my opinion, every development has pros and cons so the commencement of artificial intelligence has given benefits on larger scale.
To begin with, it has commonly been noticed that in the current era people has adopted the technicality in there day to day life. There was a time when people used to wait longer to get the reply from friends, relatives or their loved ones, however, this waiting time has been cut down to zero with the evolvement of different messaging apps. For instance, a well-known chatting application called watsapp has given the people leverage to talk in seconds. Not only people can message and talk but also the facility of video calling through another software called skype has made people realize that a person living abroad seems with us the right moment. Therefore, technology has made people maintain their relationship in their busy schedule as well.
Moreover, it has been seen that artificial intelligence has some drawbacks as it deprived people from human feelings, but has played a vital role in professional relationships. People looking for jobs abroad has got the facility to communicate easily with the interference of technology. Outing plans can be fixed within a day without waiting for a long. Also, it has benefited our soldier working for nation, as they can interact with their family member any time they want without missing them. Though the negatives are there but has been overlooked by the positives. For example, in recent survey done by times of India states that 60% of professional’s feels that application like linkdin has kept people close knitted and they do not want to pay huge for getting updates related to the jobs and they can maintain their professional relations on good note.
To conclude, I would rather say that technology has improved the thought process to take relationship seriously by talking and getting mingled with the person of your choice and make yourself socially aware of what is happening.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09510869565 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72658092874 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567934782609 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.263642992 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219641134158 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749049241184 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473343700461 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138804790099 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385176439491 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.