Everyone of us should conern deeply that we are making moutains of rubbish daily. Contributed by the rocketing-up population and consumpitions we purchase, the phenomenon would bring more issues if the governments do not make feasible policis to improve the situation.
To begin with, the huge population is the major reason resuts in the rubbish problem. Evidently, the more people, the more waste they product. By human-being's expasion, the place we live is challenged by lots of factors like farmland demand or desertation, meanwhile, we are also facing the problem that there is not enough land for rubbish. In China, many major cities , Beijing, Hangzhoul, for instance, it is reported the daily rubbish had to be transported to another city, finding a place to burry them.
Additionaly, by the development of techonology, people now adays buy more things than before. Consequently, there are more rubbish if they do not need them anymore. For example, maybe you are using the state-in-art smartphones now, while how about the one you bought ten years ago? Yes, many of them in the garbage moutain. Let alone the computers or funitures we dumped.
Before it's getting too late, the governments should make policies corresponding to the local conditions to improve the rubbish. First, encouraging people to purchase environmental friendly products by tax regulation is the essential way to lower down the amount of gagrage, which is also a feasible stimulate for companies, letting them to produce more biodegradable products in stead of the plastic wares for example. Second, help these companies focusing on recycling with advanced technology, such as recylcing rubbsih to generate electricity, is popular in large cities in China.
In all, all of us are responsible with the rubbish issue since we make the day we live now, the Government should take rules above to handle the problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...for rubbish. In China, many major cities , Beijing, Hangzhoul, for instance, it is...
^^
Line 7, column 377, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'instead of'?
Suggestion: instead of
... to produce more biodegradable products in stead of the plastic wares for example. Second, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2393442623 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92228500816 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622950819672 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2478846622 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.533333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276050373126 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853790756924 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591602738439 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144136225388 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274917166134 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.