Nowadays young people admire sports stars though they often do not set a good example Do you think this is a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Nowadays, young people admire sports stars though they often do not set a good example. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Sport is hugely popular around the world. Some people enjoy by playing a sport and others just by watching it. People arouse a like and a dislike for teams and players, and then follow them in different aspects. Though some sports stars may not set a good example, but I believe there are many positive sides of admiring sports stars.

A magnificient play and the struggle of players inspires and motivates people to work hard for their goals. When fans follow athletes with all their heart, they tend to know everything about them such as the place they come from and their family background, which also tells them about their struggle and perseverance. Therefore, people learn from the success of such personalities and strive hard to grow and achieve their goals. For example, Sachin Tendulkar’s success story encouraged many people the world over to pursue their field of interest and give their best to get the goal. This way, young generation would learn and grow; thus, they would make their country proud.

Furthermore, the profession of sports would have a secured future. With millions of fans admiring their favourite player, number of audience to see them would dramatically increase that would help the government to sustain such activites. The funds received from these fans could be used to organize more events, which would promote sports to a higher level, rendering the field of sports a secured and long term. To illustrate, Europe organizes 5 football tournaments every year and earns $500 million just by selling the tickets of the matches.

In conclusion, sports have undoubtedly become widely popular globally. People admire athletes that may have some negatives; however, following such celebrities would have several advantages for the individuals and the governments in many ways.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18367346939 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55986674765 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3039345322 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.6 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151040316576 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560923075646 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060960548917 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977610451973 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682013512731 0.056905535591 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.