With access to the internet and social media websites, many children are exposed to a number of dangerous situations. Adults should thus limit access to the internet for their children.
Do you agree or disagree?
Parents ought to restrict availability of the web and social platforms to their offspring because children could unintenionally access many websites that pose detrimental circumstances. I concur with the given assertion. This essay shall elucidate the major factors such as fake friendships and terrorist activities that could cause major challenges for kids.
Many suspicious people create accounts on social sites to collect significant data and deceive individuals. They try to befriend others and ask for confidential information after a certain period, and they target bairns because of unawareness of such fraudulent activities. In addition, children might share crucial information like bank details that could be a problematic situation for the parents. For instance, cyber cell in a developing nation reported a proliferate in bank scams through fake profiles and friendships on social media.
Furthermore, a child might click on an anonymous link that could demonstrate terrorism activities. Many videos and pictures involving violent events are accessible on the internet that could hurt the mental health of many little ones. Moreover, some children might adapt such dangerous activites, which could be a threat to the world. To illustrate, some people might get motivated by watching terrorist videos and indulge themselves in such catastrophic events. Therefore, it is vital for adults to control the reach to social websites and the internet.
In conclusion, easy availability to technological facilities such as the world wide web and social sites could trouble children in ways that may lead to loss of personal information and involvement in threatful activities. Consequently, parents should monitor their offspring's access to such websites and applications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...er cell in a developing nation reported a proliferate in bank scams through fake profiles and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74339622642 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09463873382 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603773584906 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0262560808 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26078333025 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874467936723 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720382240331 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152468706918 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240730355766 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.