The improvements in medical assistance have a perceptible effect on society worldwide. Nowadays, people are living not only longer and healthier life, but also their life span average is rising up steadily. Although there are advantages of this progress, I personally think that the drawbacks far outpaced the benefits because it is a double-edged sword for the community in the long-term.
The only noticeable advantage of living longer is that people can stay even longer with their beloved, which, in turn, means that their knowledge and wisdom are inherited by their younger generation. Elders are an infinite source of information and experience which can help others to face many challenges of life. For instance, kids and adolescents can, empowered with that privileged knowledge, easily avoid the sweet temptation of drugs and others harmful additions.
On the contrary, there are two main drawbacks of having a sustained growth of longevity. Firstly, the number of humans on earth inevitably will rise. Under this scenario basic resources, particularly food, would be in high demand. This could provoke a shortage of food at global scale, badly affecting developing countries. Moreover, if people live far beyond the retirement age, they will not contribute to the economy at all, but they will still need to use the public services ( transportation, welfare, etc.). As a direct consequence, public administrations would irremediably have to raise taxes as a quick way to face that unexpected cost. For example, in Spain, due to its overwhelming number of retires, is the country with the highest taxation levels in Europe.
To conclude, although it obvious that elderly people can contribute immensely with their expertise, it cannot be ignored that society might witness a food shortfall and an unexpected tax increase.
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Some people say the main way to be happy in life is to have a lot of money.How might having a lot of money make people happy?What other things in life can make people happy? 67
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced. 11
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do yo u agree with this statement? 61
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of job should be highly paid? (The answer is a sample not written by myself. The goal is to compare the 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'services'' or 'service's'?
Suggestion: services'; service's
... they will still need to use the public services transportation, welfare, etc.. As a di...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll still need to use the public services transportation, welfare, etc.. As a dire...
^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...c services transportation, welfare, etc.. As a direct consequence, public adminis...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38541666667 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92518390988 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1975256682 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.785714286 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165157853407 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481959880545 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502356936148 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0977849565202 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730123065462 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.