The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work, shopping and education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, traffic jams have become a tangled problem, which poses a credible threat throughout the world. Hence, it has been claimed that the necessity of daily travelling for work, education and shopping should be minimized to overcome this problem. In my opinion, it appears that this paradigm arguably fails to alleviate traffic jams because it is an impractical solution.
First, lessening the need for commuting seems elusive. Taking for granted that technological advancement has become inextricable in every discipline, but reducing the demand of people’s daily routine for work, education and shopping is impossible. This is because some jobs require from their employees to perform their works at the premises, as well as a significant portion of students attend their schools since they are not convinced of distant learning. For example, construction labourer, who build residences, cannot work remotely. Therefore, if the government implemented this plan, it would be unrealistic.
Second, there are more efficient approaches that are more likely to ease traffic congestion. One of these ways is to provide commuters with an impetus to travel by public transport. Thus, by using public transport, a substantial proportion of travellers will leave their vehicles, and this leads to reducing the traffic congestion. For instance, concerned authorities may enhance public transportation services, so people will be prompted to use them more, which helps to avoid heavy traffic.
In conclusion, minimizing the need to commute tend to be infeasible due to several reasons. Accordingly, I believe that to lessen traffic problems, the government would rather improve public transportation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68359375 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05403555623 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66796875 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6769013049 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.928571429 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196659483962 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619494760553 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448634018558 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104098054048 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416323466586 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.