The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work, shopping and education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Urbanization has brought the term traffic congestion into existence. A school of thought believe that traffic can only be controlled by limiting the daily commuters' need for travel. However, I am not convinced that this is the only or the best way.
Apparently, reasons that substantiate the claim 'the less frequently people travel in a city, the fewer traffic jams they create' - require thorough analysis. Firstly, the main reasons city dwellers commute on a daily basis are for study, business, job, shopping and social gathering. Some of them could be done from home due to the advancement of technology through e-learning, online shopping and work from home concept. This will reduce the traffic to a certain extent. To illustrate, a survey conducted by Australian Traffic Authority found out that 75% commuters in private cars travel for shopping, job and education and it is clear that if people can work from home, do online shopping and enrol in e-learning, traffic congestion would be reduced, if not solved.
On the contrary, work at home is not possible for a great number of workers such as nurses, doctors, police and hence it is necessary for them to travel to their workplaces daily. Moreover, online learning cannot be an alternative to the classroom-based education and online shopping is yet to replace the traditional shopping approach. Furthermore, it is evident that controlling the necessity for travel for the day to day activities is not the only way to manage traffic. Improving the public transportation, carpooling and encouraging pedestrians and bike riders could be some great solutions.
To conclude, limiting the need for travelling for city dwellers would help control the traffic problem to some extent but other measures should be in place. The government should encourage people to use more environmentally friendly mode of transportation to tackle both traffic and pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-02 | yaldaasgari | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | prabhpreet kaur | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Prachi Agrawal | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | sdrocks91 | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-08 | Saira Faiz | 67 | view |
- You have just moved into a new home and are planning to hold a party. You are worried that noise may disturb your neighbour.Write a letter to your neighbour. In your letterintroduce yourselfdescribe your plans for the partyinvite your neighbour to comeYou 78
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside the big cities.Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Nowadays many jobs are more stressful and the working day is longer What are the reasons for this What can employers do to help employees 74
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and, as a result, people gravitate towards buying their products.What problems does this cause? What could be done to encourage people to buy local products? 73
- The education a child receives at home from having parents who are positive role models is more important than the academic education a child receives at school. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: FEWER_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'less traffic'?
Suggestion: less traffic
...frequently people travel in a city, the fewer traffic jams they create - require thorough ana...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28104575163 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96910138423 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575163398693 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.713092279 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.428571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340819811321 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110448402444 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618188958031 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196382555532 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555187220758 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.