In the past, knowledge was contained in books. Nowadays, knowledge is uploaded to the internet.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Traditionally the information, data, and transcripts were recorded and preserved in books, but with the recent technological advancements, they are replaced by the Internet. This essay will discuss if this is a positive or a negative development and will conclude with why I believe the latter is better.
There are many benefits of using the Internet to contain knowledge. Firstly, the Internet is a cost-effective option compared to books. Since one does not need to worry about finding a specific place to store this or have to plan for maintenance, it does eliminate the costs related to these. For example, the data uploaded on the Internet only requires a cloud memory, which is limitless and hassle-free. Additionally, the Internet is an easily accessible resource that is available from any part of the world. One does not have to travel to a request to the specific library or store to access it. For these reasons, it is easy to believe that information stored on the Internet is a cheaper and effective way compared to books.
On the other side, some people believe that knowledge contained in books is less risky than the Internet. With the progress in technology, there is always a fear of technical glitches or cyber-attacks. For instance, some terrorist groups can hire hackers to destroy or damage the information that is valuable to a nation or to any group. Books on the other hand, if stored in a safe location can provide a better option in the long run. Therefore, it is a reasonable argument of storing the knowledge in the books is beneficial.
In conclusion, it is an undeniable fact that the Internet has revolutionized the way we do many things around us, including the storage of information. I strongly believe that despite minor challenges with cybersecurity, the benefits of the Internet far outweigh the drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00970873786 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03837825836 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543689320388 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7346993217 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.75 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202480394574 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637819133781 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596505701501 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106643382608 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329354038629 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.