It is commonly witnessed that conventional techniques were used to instill pupils in the past times; however, a significant number of students are being taught by teachers with the help of new methods of technology nowadays. Both the merits and demerits of this trend will be discussed in the following paragraphs.
The first and foremost advantage of this trend is the better understanding and core knowledge of subjects. A majority of the students are opting smart classes, which provides effective and depth knowledge of concepts in details because illustrations, graphics, diagrams related to the topics are added in online classes. These graphical representations provide more clarity of concepts and topics to them. Therefore, this approach enables them to enrich their theoretical as well as practical knowledge.
Another clear advantage is the flexibility. New technology of teaching includes countless benefits such as recoding and downloading of the lectures. These recorded and downloaded sessions and tests can be stored by students for later use. Also, these can be accessed by them at any time and at any place accordingly. Thus, this method provides several merits.
On the contrary, continuous studies on screens, without any naps and breaks, can cause sever back-pains, low eyesight and headaches to the readers, which can affect their mental as well as physical health. Furthermore, students read digital content only. Without internet connections, these approaches can not be accessed. Hence, lack of network can become a barrier to readers.
To conclude, although there are number of positive effects of this trend, the disadvantages must also be considered into account.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52107279693 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94445877795 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639846743295 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.7016843342 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0625 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275960966745 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769692044938 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692819653448 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142656119999 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816317410417 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.