In the past, most people spent their entire career working for one company, whereas people nowadays move from one job to another.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of each? Which do you think is better?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Between the past and the present, the career path decisions have undoubtedly faced enormous changes. while most people almost spent their entire life in one job previously, nowadays various career changes are the normal case. In my opinion, today's working habits are better for several reasons. However, there are arguments on both sides that will be considered in this essay.
On the one hand, in the past, people were more stable and less worried because of the consistency of their job routines. one working place, one team and specific tasks to be repeated daily. For example, a public-sector employee who had spent about twenty years of his life in the same workforce and under the same conditions might be less worried about his retired pensions and any financial-related issues because of his strong bond with the institution which he belongs to. However, there is no comparison between the experience that a multi-careers employee can have in contrast with this one. To explain, when a worker is doing the repeated tasks under the same conditions daily, it leads to limited learning and thus narrow his experiences, Additionally, there is a financial disadvantage for such working types, as an employee usually gets stable salary but with no significant increases overtime, therefore he can not achieve bigger life goals like moving to a city of his dreams or buying luxurious vehicles.
On the other hand, today's working conditions are quite different than before. Two or three jobs in different corporations, with a total career-shift in some times, is the normal case for employees in today's life. It comes with some disadvantages as it perhaps is much imbalanced and risky which could result in psychological issues for individuals, like confusion, worrying and anxiety. Nevertheless, in my opinion, its advantages overweigh all those issues. Because of the high experiences and improvement that this kind can add to workers. Furtherly, it leads to earning higher salaries and opening opportunities for managerial and leadership career levels. Justin Traudo, the president of Canada today, is a good example for today's workers, as he first worked as a teacher, had all the experience then shifted to working in politics, and his professional leadership skills are obvious.
In conclusion, while it was more balanced and less worrying to work in one career in the past, today's changing careers have more advantages as it helps in improvement on personal and financial scales.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ave undoubtedly faced enormous changes. while most people almost spent their entire l...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... the consistency of their job routines. one working place, one team and specific ta...
^^^
Line 3, column 885, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'increases'' or 'increase's'?
Suggestion: increases'; increase's
...s stable salary but with no significant increases overtime, therefore he can not achieve ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
... working conditions are quite different than before. Two or three jobs in different ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21695760599 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89673818202 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5536159601 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 90.7542786889 49.4020404114 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.058823529 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5882352941 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58823529412 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264213034811 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837112354309 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649846800501 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167078139503 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504576855868 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.