People are living in a ‘throwaway society’, using things for a short time and then throwing them away. What are the causes of this? What problems does it lead to?
With the rising trend in consumerism, people buy new and dispose old stuff constantly. This essay will highlight the common causes behind this pattern and consequences emerged from this.
Coming towards the causes, firstly, variety in items seems to be the prime factor. This could be linked with the advent of global marketing which provide access to international products leading to diversity in choices. This not only facilitates buyers with numerous options but also help in provision of cheaper item. For example, Chinese machines in market has helped many small entrepreneurs to setup their business in much less startup costs. Secondly, advancement in technology is also a substantial contributor in this phenomenon, as it allure people's mind toward purchasing brand new products with latest features; such as smart phones, which come in newer version and models, automatically altering the needs.
While discussing the outcomes, first of all, delusional needs are created where people purchase things that do not really matter, for instance, trending and fashionable clothes whose importance become vague after launch of next fashion. This interrupt the money flow and culminates in inflation. Additionally, manufacturing of new items and disposed of old ones causes immense environmental issues, such as global warming and rise in non-degradable plastic content resulting in subsidized standard of living for all.
In conclusion, the general bias could be linked to many causes, such as availability of choices and technological improvements, which results in disruption of money flow in society and also could be attached with the increase in environmental problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: CAN_SETUP[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to set up'?
Suggestion: to set up
...ket has helped many small entrepreneurs to setup their business in much less startup cos...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...nd toward purchasing brand new products with latest features; such as smart phones, which c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, really, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62352941176 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9734439131 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670588235294 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.03695749 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.363636364 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113980273613 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422985288192 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270524235343 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689416326138 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335730229793 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.