Some says that the government should not spent the money on the art because music and painting for example are not making people's life becoming better. Do you agree or disagree?
Spending money on art should not the preference of government, as opine by some, who relate it with the non-existent impact on the lives of people. I completely agree with this assertion and will explain why money expend is essential on development purposes only.
First of all, money should be spend on basic necessities of life which have direct influence on people. This means that the major portion of budget should be allocated for the relief purposes, such as subsidizing the tax-payers and free healthcare. If public is lacking basic facilities and government is investing in art, such as construction of monuments, then these will merely be considered as the vanity projects of politicians; which, although, are built by the taxes, however, tax-payers are not benefiting from those. This can lead to serious consequences, for example, Strikes and riots.
Furthermore, art projects does not constitute in development of country, for example, Cinema and Stadium are meant for leisure activities only. Take the example of Dubai, as it has world class shopping malls and luxurious outing places, but on the other hand, depend on other countries for skilled manpower such as Engineers, Doctors and even Teachers to work in relevant departments. This clearly shows that the priorities should be set, for instance, Finland allocate major portion of their budget on education, and consequently, its advances in research and technology are example for world.
In conclusion, although art has its own place, but extrapolating results from aforementioned points, it seems wise to state that money ought to be spend for the betterment of public through subsidies and construction which will not only increase jobs but also raise quality of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spent'?
Suggestion: spent
...only. First of all, money should be spend on basic necessities of life which have...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
... First of all, money should be spend on basic necessities of life which have direct influence on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30575539568 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89930958445 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60071942446 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.402343711 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 7.06120827912 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189255465577 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734544235841 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280284789919 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111482579513 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00993607298273 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.