By paying more to employees based on their performance level, you can keep their motivation high. Do you agree this is the best way to encourage employees?
Increment in salaries on the basis of working abilities can be considered as motivational as opine by some. I completely agree with this statement in question prompt and will explain my reasons in subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, People work mostly to earn money, and use it to live a happy life as it is considered the way of world. This culture is perceived from the birth; as people complete their study, choose career pathways and later work in those specific fields to live a respectable and comfortable life by fulfilling necessities of living, such as food and healthcare, by compensating through wages. As per my own experience, people feel successful and promoted after an appraisal as it brings a sense of relief from myriad of financial issues.
Secondly, increase in income means a direct appreciation at work from employer which not only creates an affection towards company but also result in feeling of responsibility. These culminates in higher efficiency as people try to perform wholeheartedly resulting in achievement of perfection, which could easily be seen in their output. If an organization does not offer bonus, workers would feel worthless leading to deteriorating effect; for instance, decline in effectiveness, which in the big picture affects revenue generation.
Although, other methods such as awards on devoted work and construction of friendly workspace environment does produce better results, however, could be counted as temporary measures to boost the morale as these will not be able to accomplish the prime reason of work which is salary.
In conclusion, I believe that a pay raise is supreme element for inspiration as it brings perception of devotion, responsibility and affection towards employer; and also help in lessening the monetary burden everyone faces.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to career'
Suggestion: to career
... as people complete their study, choose career pathways and later work in those specif...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37543859649 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0968048149 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642105263158 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.032975102 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.2 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0731130647229 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300294142298 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286171208172 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0382538155146 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288553842161 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.