People don t read newspapers or watch tv news but they rely on internet for news Is that positive or negative development

Traditional ways of getting information about current affairs; newspapers or television are not in demand for few individuals as they consider internet worthy for grasping news. Where, this phenomena has both holistic and atomistic approaches.

Accounting positive one that assure for having global village that promotes the criteria of harmony. For example, through internet people get engaged at platform where they have conversations and reviews relating particular news through which relations of one's get expanded all over the world. Even, reliance on online news save both time, money as well. In the case of former masses donot have need to visit market to buy newspaper or paying connection expenses of television, and in the term of later, on internet people just in one second get the news without wasting time to find appropriate one on newspaper and t.v . Ensuring above explanations some masses have choice with online practices rather than offline.

Inspite of above mentioned, disadvantageous side cannot be overlooked, looking at the unemploymet criteria that is emerging, because reliance of people on internet. To examplify, hawkers and other workers who work in newspaper industry donot have other sort of job, owning to decrementation in demand of this sector, such persons are at the verge of srake for earning. Another demerit is cyber crime that has been major concerned for societies. Confidential information of individuals is getting hacked and misused by someone's for their own sake. Such circumstances may lead to grave outputs in the means of either suicidal tendency or anxiety.

In conclusion, though reliance of few masses is fruitfull in somehow, but negatives of it should be considered as lack in jobs and cyber crime.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ternet worthy for grasping news. Where, this phenomena has both holistic and atomist...
^^^^
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and atomistic approaches. Accounting positive one that assure for having glob...
^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...well. In the case of former masses donot have need to visit market to buy newspap...
^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... visit market to buy newspaper or paying connection expenses of television, and i...
^^
Line 3, column 624, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ind appropriate one on newspaper and t.v . Ensuring above explanations some masses...
^^
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xiety. In conclusion, though reliance of few masses is fruitfull in somehow, b...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36101083032 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85262684978 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642599277978 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8048581055 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.230769231 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239118728049 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716315671855 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668522727594 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130137135186 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072908197689 0.056905535591 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.