In this day and age, people don’t have to wait for news to be broadcasted on their televisions sets and radios or be delivered to their homes via a newspaper. Instead they simply get it on demand via the internet.
Traditional medium of news is now fading away as more and more cheaper alternatives are available. As a corporate entity delivering news, it’s much easier to connect with their audience via social media or internet blogs than via traditional means as it is not only cheaper but more convenient. As the new generation hooks up on internet and social medial, content and news discovery becomes a seamless experience. Also, the internet is accessible to everyone, which gives independent journalist an opportunity to report news in a more independent manner in countries where the news agencies are controlled by the government. However, news delivery via internet is a double edged sword. Where it guarantees independence in news reporting, it lacks accountability of the article written by the journalist. Also, journalists are now trying to generate more clicks on their website and in doing so are resorting to fake news and reporting news that are not properly vetted and researched. Many traditional journalists argue that this is worse than state controlled media.
In my view, this is a positive development as we’re no longer bound by limited means of news discovery. If we use well established sources on the internet for news discovery, we will get more accurate and faster news as compared to traditional channels.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...livered to their homes via a newspaper. Instead they simply get it on demand via the in...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cheaper' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cheaper
... of news is now fading away as more and more cheaper alternatives are available. As a corpor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11417322835 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98129255126 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57874015748 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5806721975 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293057810999 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112111669935 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461043546276 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198365714301 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166393967551 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.