People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Globalization has been popularily accepted all over the world because of the technological advancements and enchanement in transportation system. The advantages certainly outweighs the disadvantages of the developmental factors and in this essay I will explain my view with supporting examples.
To commence with, the technology has broaded the spectrum of mass media communication and transportation. People have made maximum out of it. Nowadays, people can connect to the each other through internet since few decades. The Information Technology industry has been booming recently.
For instance, as per statistics 89 percent of world population has been using internet. Besides, Multiples businesses are rising using mass medias and transportation services. However, avoiding such services in the current times is impractical.
The effects are less proportionate as compared to the boon but this cannot be ignored. Due to such advances , people have started to migrate to anywhere in the world making brain drain to developed countries. Many developing countries have been highly impacted with such liberal ideas. For example, 40 percent of rescources travel overseas in order to change better lifestyle. Additionally, the drastic increase in air pollution and sound pollution because of new transportation system. To exemplify, The air quality is unhealthy in asian continental countries due to irreponsibily usage of cars and other vehicles.
To sum up, although there are few negative impacts causing environmenal issues, the availabilty and easiness to prosper individual definitely has more positive impacts of developmental factors. Instead it should be used maturely and take care of the cultures too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... cannot be ignored. Due to such advances , people have started to migrate to anywh...
^^
Line 8, column 195, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...itive impacts of developmental factors. Instead it should be used maturely and take car...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78346456693 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23688849603 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.657480314961 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1738643912 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4117647059 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9411764706 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242023458243 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610348239978 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598110508954 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108417360367 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730460529985 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.65 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.