People should focus more on solving problems related to the future, and should not spend time thinking about the past.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Some believe that the people’s concentration should be to find solutions to the future issues, rather than spending time mulling over the past. In my opinion, this is the best way forward for any individual who had repeated past failures.
Firstly, people’s health will deteriorate if they constantly re-visit their troubled past. This is because they cannot find any solution to the problem by simply thinking about it. Consequently, they will waste valuable time at their disposal, which will add only to the on-going issues they are facing. For instance, a student, who is depressed with the previous semester exam’s result, cannot focus his attention on the present semester subjects and the exams and subsequently, he will fail in the present semester exams. Thus, it is of no use to the individual as well as his immediate family if he/she persistent with their unhealthy thought processes and endangering their physical and mental health.
However, it is advisable to focus one’s concentration to resolve the future problems. By doing this, they will be able to stay in the present and can straighten the past problems, instead of thinking over it repeatedly. For example, the student’s job is to pass the subjects, which will earn him a good salary in the future. If not, his future life will be problematic. To avoid the future problems and to forget the past failures, it is better to keep themselves busy with work and try to solve the issues that they contemplate in the future.
In conclusion, to deal with burdensome past, it is advisable not to mull over it sand it is better to concentrate on resolving the problems that may occur in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...ir disposal, which will add only to the on-going issues they are facing. For instance, a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03558718861 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87087830196 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555160142349 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0803166198 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.846153846 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166940790947 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597543466923 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508293791276 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106494431021 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315057638938 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.