The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company.
What can companies do to increase staff productivity?
companies are hiring people with good work experience great skills, but this is not the end of the recruiting process, the manpower hired affects positively and negatively companies, depending on how their results are. how could enterprises ensure the good results of their workers?. I would like to develop this topic and then I will give a possible solution.
Enterprises select the best worker to help the company climbing the high mountain of the success, in spite of this, not always people hired, give the best results, and this affects negatively to the company because this generates low productivity, the happiness at work decrease and all the environment turns into sad faces everywhere.
On the other hand, a company that has good results from its workers has more chances to be successful, indeed, that brings good work environment and as a result of this, company's productivity increase.
My solution is all about motivation, if owners invest more money in their own staff, they will feel that they are important for the company and motivation and productivity will climb to the top, for instance, Google company, invest a plethora of money in their workers, to get them comfortable at work and at home as well, they keep their worker's families happy with presents and some bonus.
In conclusion, if companies want to have a productive staff, they have to invest in them, and it is not only money bonus or giving them comfortable places to work, one of the successful tools to keep them motivated and increase at the same time their skills are training programs in the workplace and set goals with a good rewards program, that definitely will increase the productivity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Companies
companies are hiring people with good work experi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: How
...es, depending on how their results are. how could enterprises ensure the good resul...
^^^
Line 13, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...initely will increase the productivity.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0390070922 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7004075797 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556737588652 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 20.2975951904 197% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 127.224692764 49.4020404114 258% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 203.0 106.682146367 190% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.2857142857 20.7667163134 194% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8571428571 7.06120827912 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133795338749 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562578685271 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548763735564 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773183583041 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511073027814 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.5 13.0946893788 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.34 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.84 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.1190380762 178% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.