Human activity has had a negative effect on plants and animal all over the world. Some people think that it is too late to do something about it. Others think that there is still time to take effective action. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Human activity has had a negative effect on plants and animal all over the world. Some people think that it is too late to do something about it. Others think that there is still time to take effective action. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

All the species alive on earth have been affected by Humans, Nowadays part of the population assume that it is not anything to do for restore or fix the damage done so far, but not everyone reason on the same way. I believe we still have to do a plethora of things to preserve vegetation and wildlife on our planet. This essay will discuss the issue using examples to support and demonstrate the point.

Humanity has been damaging the environment and life on earth since the beginning of the time because they have been thinking that we are the dominant species on land. Now, after all these thousands of years, we have generated a serious negative impact on our biodiversity. For instance, a study made by the University of Earth from California, reveals that during the last century, more than 320 species have disappeared from the land. Consequently, humanity is not able to bring that extinct vegetation and animals back to life and that is the sad part of the story, but not all of the species are lost.

On the other hand, we still have a big biodiversity on our planet, and this is the positive face of all of this, despite we have lost hundreds of our plants and wildlife, we still can keep and preserve our current ones, for example, according to a research done by Green Peace in 2018, our planet still has more than seven thousand of species alive, and their future is in our hands. that demonstrates we are still on time to save our biodiversity.

To sum up, there is a highly negative stage we people assume there is nothing to do to save our earth life, we cannot bring species back to life but we could preserve our current vegetation and wildlife. I strongly believe in the future humans could bring the extinct species back to life with technology.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mpact on our biodiversity. For instance, a study made by the University of Earth ...
^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...t is the sad part of the story, but not all of the species are lost. On the other hand...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...live, and their future is in our hands. that demonstrates we are still on time to sa...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, still, after all, for example, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61829652997 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50176623614 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485804416404 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.8370338593 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.090909091 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8181818182 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10007751532 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462707801629 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0226111785386 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653295124557 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144906846453 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.