Human activity has had a negative effect on plants and animal all over the world. Some people think that it is too late to do something about it. Others think that there is still time to take effective action. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
There has been decrease in oxygen all over the world. Moreover, ozone layer is depleting day by day, and due to which plants are reducing. Furthermore, this has lead to water shortage and subsequently animal life-cycle is getting disturbed and humans are thought to be main reason behind this. Few people believe; it is too late to react and nothing can be done, while on the other hand few think, we still have time to react and improvements can be made.
A lot of people believe, industrialisation and pollution generated by human being to be the main reason for negative effect on plants and animals. These days, everyone is busy with their fast paced life and no one has been seen giving attention to mother nature. On numerous occasions, different corporate giants try to promote and create awareness amongst general public, regarding everyone's responsibility to maintain cleanliness and contribute towards betterment of world. But, situation is getting worsened day by day. In current scenario Nepal is the only country, which is contributing oxygen to the world, while all other countries emit carbon dioxide.
However, there has been a lot of negative contribution been made by different countries, at this point it is important for countries to focus on different options that won't emit carbon dioxide and increase its index. It could be done; by promoting electric vehicles, producing electricity via hydro power projects and try to increase plantation. So, that things could be sorted accordingly.
In my opinion, it is not too late and situation can improve, if we all make sure to work towards betterment and play our role accordingly. Furthermore, it is important individuals realise their responsibilities and contribute positively towards betterment, so that this world remains liveable place for our future generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 457, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to react and improvements can be made. A lot of people believe, industrialisati...
^^^
Line 2, column 358, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...to promote and create awareness amongst general public, regarding everyones responsibility to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 661, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll other countries emit carbon dioxide. However, there has been a lot of negativ...
^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rojects and try to increase plantation. So, that things could be sorted accordingly. I...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, while, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23728813559 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96768771156 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613559322034 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7644305836 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165365793292 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502747697381 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484991517824 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920748727383 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518745931757 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.