In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.
Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experiences
In England, elders used to change their place, to stay in houses where more people from the same age is living, and they are assisted by nurses. The country eventually covers their old care expenses in these places, but, is England or older's relatives who should cover their expenses?. I reckon, all their expenses should be paid by their relatives, but the country should cooperate to elders' families to arrange with all this financial support. this essay will discuss this issue using examples to support arguments and demonstrate points.
Indeed, the government is supporting in many cases elders when they decide to live in elders' houses, and that is a superb cooperation to the older community, because not all retired people or their relatives have the financial resources to resist elders' houses expenses, for instance a research made in the same country last year, reveals that more than 65% of retired people have pensions to support just their daily expenses, 30% can afford their daily expenses and save money and 5% of them does not have access to any retirement compensation. Therefore the country is giving a great aid to the older community sector.
However, it does not mean that elders are only the government responsibility, because families have a potential responsibility with their grandparents and in many cases, relatives have excellent financial conditions, for example, in the same research, it could be seen that the middle class is only 20% of the population, 70% is high class, and 10% is low class. Seen these results, it could be concluded that the majority of the population can afford their old parents expenses at retirement houses.
To sum up, although the retired people do not have access to a big pension, their relatives are able to support their retirement house expenses, but the government should give some bonus or incentives to promote and help families who are in charge of them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1673, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...l class='support'>support. this essay will discuss this issue using exa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1152, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...;access to any retirement compensation. Therefore the country class='is'>is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'classes'?
Suggestion: classes
...gt;research, class='it'>it class='could'>could be class=&ap...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 721, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: class
...ass='that'>that the middle class class='is'>is only 20% of the po...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1074, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Class
...% class='is'>is low class. class='seen'>seen class='th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1174, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'classes'?
Suggestion: classes
...ese results, class='it'>it class='could'>could be concluded...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arge of class='them'>them.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i reckon, in many cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4890.0 1615.20841683 303% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 445.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 10.9887640449 5.12529762239 214% => Less chars per word wanted.
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 10.5961821367 2.80592935109 378% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43595505618 0.561755894193 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1170.0 506.74238477 231% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.6 1.60771543086 162% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 5.43587174349 294% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 49.0 20.2975951904 241% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 316.30497863 49.4020404114 640% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 543.333333333 106.682146367 509% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 49.4444444444 20.7667163134 238% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0253147944907 0.244688304435 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237532442055 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0104001909086 0.0667982634062 16% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.026848306795 0.151304729494 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127454614425 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 55.1 13.0946893788 421% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -62.86 50.2224549098 -125% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 23.7 7.44779559118 318% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 34.2 11.3001002004 303% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 47.35 12.4159519038 381% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.0 9.78957915832 266% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 21.6 10.1190380762 213% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 26.0 10.7795591182 241% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.