"Prevention is better than cure."
Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to
spending on health education and preventative measures.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Shifting focus of Nation’s health budget from treatment modalities to preventive and educative measures is a considerable option. Although Prevention and awareness has undeniable role in health policies but in my opinion treatment part of health policies should continue receiving major financial backup from authorities, because of existence of idiopathic and genetic etiologies of diseases and impact of education and awareness is not widespread. This essay will discuss paramount of monetary support to treatment policies.
Majority of world is now suffering from genetic and idiopathic diseases, whose etiology is unknown, hence in these cases prevention would not be able to halt the progression of disease, only treatment would help in alleviating the symptoms and provide relief. According to world health report 2018, only 2% of world’s population is suffering from communicable diseases and 17%is suffering from genetic abnormalities. Etiology of a lot of diseases is still an enigma for health professionals, hence in this condition, adoption and execution of more treatment policies and financially supporting these policies is the only step which can be taken to help mankind.
Furthermore, impact of awareness and preventive program cannot be denied, but their impact is not widespread and is only limited to literate people and developed countries. For instance, in a continent like Africa where majority of diseases are either genetic or are malnutrition related, in both of these scenarios educative or awareness programs would not have any role, in a country where population and illiterate and poor, where their main concern is to earn enough money to provide food to their family authorities can only help population by providing free and more available treatment.
Although preventive and awareness programs have resulted in eradication of few diseases. Polio free India is result of such preventive and awareness program where government invested a lot in prevention and educating population about this disease, but again this success can be attained in all the scenarios.
To sum up with, albeit preventive and educative policies have a vital role in overall health policies but treatment part should get more monetary support from authorities, because of existence of idiopathic and genetic diseases and limited impact of preventive policies on all social classes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cases'' or 'case's'?
Suggestion: cases'; case's
...ose etiology is unknown, hence in these cases prevention would not be able to halt th...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p which can be taken to help mankind. Furthermore, impact of awareness and pre...
^^^
Line 5, column 583, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion by providing free and more available treatment. Although preventive and a...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can be attained in all the scenarios. To sum up with, albeit preventive and ed...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, so, still, for instance, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 10.4138276553 269% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2048.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62637362637 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01226711463 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480769230769 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 661.5 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.5077138918 49.4020404114 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 186.181818182 106.682146367 175% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0909090909 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241003467314 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109114872649 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723741178391 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148171496232 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698190820876 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.0946893788 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.06 50.2224549098 42% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.97 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.