The range and quality of food that we can buy has changed because of technological and scientific advances. Some people regard this change as an improvement, while others believe that it is harmful. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, technology has dominated almost all aspects of human's lives and it is apparent in the food industry as well. People have different views on the issue of whether the recent technological progresses have positive impact on the quality of the food products that individuals use or not. Although there have been some advantages in these scientific achievements, I argue that it was not a positive scheme for some reasons.
There are some persuasive arguments in favor of the recent changes in the food chain. Firstly, it is believed that GM technology is the knowledge of maintaining the genes of crops which could remove the defects and makes them more resistant to the pests and diseases. Secondly, GM foods eradicated famine and shortage in less affluent countries such as African nations. Finally, scientists could add some beneficial vitamins to the foods and fruits that makes them more nutritious such as vitamin D and calcium. A salient example of this is the scarcity of vitamin D in Australia which could be diminished almost 40% by adding this vitamin to the people's milk.
On the other hand, the detrimental effects of this new technology and the expansion of GM food in the market should not be neglected since it had some adverse impacts on the environment by contaminating the nearby crops. Furthermore, the results of consumption of these products are not explicit and the future consequences are not vivid to anyone. To support my claim, I can refer to an article having been published in Times magazine, indicates that in 2008 the majority of maze crops in USA had been destroyed due to the maintaining the genes by scientists which brought a severe scarcity in this food source that is one of the significant exports of this country.
In conclusion, not only the unknown results of such researches and manipulations on the people's health but also the clear effects on the environment lead to some negative attitudes to this achievements and make people cynical.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...uch researches and manipulations on the peoples health but also the clear effects on th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ment lead to some negative attitudes to this achievements and make people cynical. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02409638554 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84213522149 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53313253012 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.2124496294 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202539623953 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695781222869 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385738444832 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111908231045 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194658276919 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.