Recent advancements in technology have made TV screen so live that people do not feel the need to go for live performances (eg. live shows or concerts). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days it is argued that advanced technology has resulted in creating television and home theatre systems experience rather more realistic than live performances, so people prefer to watch programmes at home itself. In my opinion, I agree that the long leap made by visual entertainment technology vastly influenced our habit to stay home to watch programmes or shows.
Technology on the television screen has developed beyond human imagination that their treat to eyes greatly influenced our entertainment habits. At the moment, the innovations in HD experiences are improving even day by day in such a way that we have an astonishing range of products to choose from, like Ultra HD curved screen, 3D displays, surround view and Dolby home theatre to name a few. The quality of experience these elicit is scintillating that it can even excel and downplay the real-time naked-eye viewing experience.
Moreover, the vast availability of service providers to comply with the HD technology also allows all sections of the population to get their favourite show, whether it is a live performance, a deferred telecast or even one latest movie, to enjoy in high quality sitting at the comfort of their own drawing room. In addition to that, technologies are getting upgraded and updated at the blink of the eyes so that features like the pause and watch later of a live cricket game and zooming into the display can be availed by users at their preferences. These, proximity of facilitation and features make people more attached to their TV screens.
In conclusion, in my opinion, the technologies and innovations on the viewing screen at the drawing room, have brought in a pivotal change in habit of people of this era to prefer rather watch the vivid and rich experience of latest HD entertainment systems than go out for live entertainments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...her watch the vivid and rich experience of latest HD entertainment systems than go out fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08524590164 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97063655421 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55737704918 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.9737606508 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.333333333 106.682146367 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8888888889 20.7667163134 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175245012568 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717782254891 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045956573233 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112050715884 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043725196487 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.0946893788 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.