Of late, it is clearly evident that more and more shoppers are inclined to do shopping in fancy shopping malls rather buying it from local shopkeepers. As a result of this, local shop owners had to close their business. I would look this trend as negative development and I will discuss about my observations in this essay.
One serious problem that can arise from this trend is financial diversity. If shoppers are buying the products in large shopping malls, the money would go into the pockets of multi billionaire companies and there could be a possibility that this money would never come back to the society again. On the other hand, if we started purchasing it from local vendors the money would circulate in local country and subsequently it will boost the country economy.
The second issue is that; the end buyer will have to spend fortune of amount in buying their needs. What I mean here is, will increase the price of the MRP to cover their losses in building the malls and to gain the maximum profit. Wherein the other hand, this won’t be the case with local vendors, because they don’t sale for profits they sale to survive. For example, if we are buying an apple from the malls that would cost around $5, but we can purchase the same apple for $2-$3 from local shops. At the end of the day, if we compare all the product the buyer will be at loss and at the same time the local vendor too. The only one who get benefited from this corporate companies.
I strongly condemn this new trend and urge the people to start consider the local buyers instead of purchasing it from malls. Also, I request government to take steps to promote and help local shopkeepers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...le from the malls that would cost around , but we can purchase the same apple for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, second, so, for example, i mean, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64548494983 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35111751233 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548494983278 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3925952167 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21991047057 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0791885911317 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663254021962 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143687447386 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100032925261 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.