The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world spends numerous government expenditures. This money should be use in new housing and road development. Do you agree or disagree?
Today, preservation of ancient altars has drawn much needed attention than ever before. Many are of the view that collected money should be used in developing the existing amenities and infrastructure instead. I strongly opposed the idea and believe that the reverse also holds greater importance.
To commence, maintaining old structures of any city or country is as significant as preserving an age old tradition. These monuments serve as an asset and a classic representation of a particular culture and heritage. Additionally, to know and learn about history, apart from few written history books, we are solely dependant on these carefully maintained historic buildings.
Another way forward, one rewarding benefit of restoring our ancestor's marvel creation is fostering tourism. Many of the tourists travel with the soul purpose of visiting historic places and many students base their researches and projects on them. For instance, visiting the Taj Mahal, one of the seven wonders, is not always a casual visit from tourist around the world, rather it is to get themselves acquainted with the history and purpose behind building such a magnificiant edifice.
Laconically, it is most crucial to safeguard the architecture of old times, in order to build the strong historic evidences. Governments not just spend money but must also provide due protection to them, so that coming generations also get the priviledge to see and learn from their great forefather's efforts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...ew written history books, we are solely dependant on these carefully maintained historic ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, apart from, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 232.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42672413793 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96002084364 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.693965517241 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7024121353 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.454545455 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121961720558 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394918484903 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447417929001 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653997447188 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231776928219 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.