Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the last few years, a few wealthy nations have been providing monetary support to the developing countries but this is not sufficient. In my opinion, there should be a different approach to support them as this will reduce misuse of money and it will motivate people to earn their own bread.
To begin with, corruption is ubiquitous in the world. There are a few mediators who tend to take away the money before it reaches to the people who are in desperate need of it. Furthermore, even the government authorities are not prudent about this activities which are increasing the difference between rich and poor. For instance, In India, there are a few corrupt politicians who raise the money to improve the society but sometimes this funds are used for their own luxury.
On the other hand, if there are provisions made and other kind of aids are provided there are high chances of abolishing poverty from there. Wealthy countries can make a foreign direct investment in poor countries and help the residents to secure a job and earn their own living. Besides this, people will become skilled and they will not have to rely on any funding for their survival. For example, Many US based organizations have set up their call centers in India as the manpower is cheap because of this there is a surge in the standard of living of the people.
In conclusion, although financial help from developed countries has made a few changes in third world countries but they could not diminish the issue of poverty. I strongly believe that business set ups and investments in poor countries will be more beneficial rather than directly sponsoring them financial support. Hence, the foreign governments should take stern action and limit the funds and focus on making investment to increase work opportunities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...nment authorities are not prudent about this activities which are increasing the dif...
^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun US seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many '.
Suggestion: Many
...unding for their survival. For example, Many US based organizations have set up their c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, third, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92156862745 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63540564138 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565359477124 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0035500858 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.846153846 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183576974913 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647085178224 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704312950577 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114994357536 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697028492126 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.