The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be made to encourage people to use their cars less and public transport more. Discuss possible ways to encourage the use of public transport.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Congestions and air pollution connected with each other. These two issues are being face by all over the world. So this problem relates to people who are largely using private cars. Besides, it will rise from the percentage of cars emmisions. Although, owners of private cars can get benefits while using it, it will be reason for traffic jams. So i agree with arguments. In that light, i will explain in details as following:
To begin, if human strive to for better health, they must work on reducing of fuel emission that omits from car's exhausts. There is a research shows from medical journals in Germany in 1999, that enormous number of children have died from this toxic carbon which it is produced by transportation generally. As a result, it can affect on their respiratory system, and it will cause a kind of breathlessness. In addition, governoment should provide information for inhabitants in how to follow structures of deascending from the proportion of toxins and road congested alike.
Furthermore, government paly a vital rol in reducing this passive habit. For instance, forcing them in using public transportation. Consequently, it will consolidate from congested road. As it can push people to use hybrid cars " electric automobile ". Which it is a very good way to diminish from polluted airs. So that people can achieve a clean air. Nevertheless, using general transportation can help from crowded roads. Or it can increase the tax on private car users.
In sum, congested roads, and air pollution can be tackled, it is used correctly. Government can provide some solutions to reduce it by putting on serious constraints for these issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... it will be reason for traffic jams. So i agree with arguments. In that light, i ...
^
Line 2, column 388, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... i agree with arguments. In that light, i will explain in details as following: ...
^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...that omits from cars exhausts. There is a research shows from medical journals in Germany ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ortation generally. As a result, it can affect on their respiratory system, and it will c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cars ' electric automobile '. Which it is a very good way to diminish from ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 324, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ood way to diminish from polluted airs. So that people can achieve a clean air. Neverth...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, in addition, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09782608696 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9206831648 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623188405797 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7725941658 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.35 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243109539992 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755835032037 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616008882253 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155957878018 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552515746142 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.